Dave's 16 Inch Binocular Telescope Page
16 May 2002 From: Mark Suchting <[email protected]> Subject: ATM Clive Milne's 20" F5 binocular first light On Saturday and Sunday night , 11th and 12th May Clive Milne had first light with his 20" F5 binocular `scope. He is currently on an extended astronomy holiday, making his way back to Perth ( 5000 km away on the West coast of Australia ).http://deepsky.cia.com.au/binoculars/clive/510mm_binoculars.html The `all aluminium' instrument turned out to be rock steady. A small group of observers rarely had to tweak collimation, something that could be done in seconds with a `joystick' below the eyepieces. After a minor tweak on a tertiary flat to remove a hint of relative field rotation early on the first night, after a total of 18 hrs over two nights at the eyepieces , no one reported any eyestrain. It will take time for me to put my experiences to words, but I can only say that in 30 yrs of deep sky astronomy observing this was the finest two nights I have ever had. Things that spring to mind were the sight of Jupiter, watching an eclipse of one of it's satellites. Observing the glorious globular cluster Omega Centaurus nearly overhead, with twin 17mm Naglers, with the feeling that one was suspended over the top it, and seeing individual red giant stars glittering amongst the pack.. I felt as if I was seeing the object for the first time. The glorious Eta Carinae nebula appeared as a turbulent mass of shining fluid with in a sea of scattered jewels. And dark lanes and dark nebula look black .._ink_ black. We observed the dark Nebula Barnard 86 overhead and many other dark Nebula in the Milky Way. Roaming through the Large Magallenic Cloud with twin O111 filters, field after field was wreathed in Nebulosity. The Tarantula Nebula showed an amphitheater of nebulosity lit by a cluster of Super giant stars, but in a dimensional way I had never scene. Galaxies benefited from the increase in sky blackness afforded by the improved signal to noise ratio with fainter parts more easily visible than with one eye. Having had two nights experience with them, I conclude that...and this may sound strange...that the more potential there is to see in an object, the more the binoculars shine. Objects with little surface detail such as faint galaxies seem to benefit less from the binocular vision. The view was still more comfortable, and that strong feeling of `presence' was indisputable, but the gains seems to be less. Visually complex objects such as Globulars, brighter and detailed Nebula , and even clusters seemed to show a striking improvement, I think due to the brain being able to confirm subtle details that it may otherwise be overwhelmed by, amidst all the complexity. Colours are enhanced too: we spent some time looking at the colour difference in double stars which often seemed striking with all that light collecting area. Planetary nebula also showed stunning improvement. I feel the issue of the benefits of a true binocular telescope for deep sky observing is a much more complex one than first thought. I don't feel as before that there are hard and fast rules, such as the equivalent mono aperture being say 40% more, which may be used by ATM's to decide whether to invest in building a binocular or not. I think its simply a case of comparing apples and oranges everything simply looks different the view with two eyes gives you a feeling of presence and reality about what you see that simply defies any comparisons between mono/ bino views. I liken it to viewing in a parallel Universe or something... If you want astronomical views to be as good as you can have, using separate optical systems in the way that we already have mounted in our head, and